<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smear, smear smear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.policywank.com/2006/09/10/smear-smear-smear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.policywank.com/2006/09/10/smear-smear-smear/</link>
	<description>Wankers Welcome</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 20:29:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://www.policywank.com/2006/09/10/smear-smear-smear/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.policywank.com/2006/09/10/smear-smear-smear/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Sadly, there&#039;s no real Democratic counterpart to this. The closest thing is the Democracy Corps project that James Carville&#039;s been doing for the last little while. Carville is an advocate of hitting back and hitting them in the mouth when you do it. Without Carville, I don&#039;t think Clinton&#039;s presidency could have survived the impeachment. I think he might have been forced to resign. Carville was the architect of the whole &quot;we&#039;re focused every day on doing the business of the american people&quot; strategy that helped to lift Clinton&#039;s poll numbers and make the GOP congress look like a bunch of nuts. Unfortunately, few Democratic candidates seem to have the backbone to follow Carville&#039;s advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, there&#8217;s no real Democratic counterpart to this. The closest thing is the Democracy Corps project that James Carville&#8217;s been doing for the last little while. Carville is an advocate of hitting back and hitting them in the mouth when you do it. Without Carville, I don&#8217;t think Clinton&#8217;s presidency could have survived the impeachment. I think he might have been forced to resign. Carville was the architect of the whole &#8220;we&#8217;re focused every day on doing the business of the american people&#8221; strategy that helped to lift Clinton&#8217;s poll numbers and make the GOP congress look like a bunch of nuts. Unfortunately, few Democratic candidates seem to have the backbone to follow Carville&#8217;s advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fantaflair</title>
		<link>http://www.policywank.com/2006/09/10/smear-smear-smear/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>fantaflair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.policywank.com/2006/09/10/smear-smear-smear/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>So where is the Democratic counterpart to all this?
I guess I wouldn&#039;t care to have the smear and distortion used against the repubs, just the simple truth would demonize them.  But from where I sit, we&#039;re not even attempting any rebuttals.  Are the Dems just happy to think &quot;the blogs&quot; are enough?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So where is the Democratic counterpart to all this?<br />
I guess I wouldn&#8217;t care to have the smear and distortion used against the repubs, just the simple truth would demonize them.  But from where I sit, we&#8217;re not even attempting any rebuttals.  Are the Dems just happy to think &#8220;the blogs&#8221; are enough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

